Category Archives: News

Rubbish is personal

Leave a reply

What does council do that affects ratepayers more than anything else? That affects them more often than any other issue?

Rubbish. Yes, rubbish. Or more precisely, making it possible for ratepayers to get rid of stuff – green stuff, glass stuff, plastic stuff, paper and cardboard stuff, stuff that is broken or unusable, stuff that is simply not needed or wanted any more – all sorts of stuff.

Most ratepayers interact with council every two weeks, when bins are emptied.

Stop a ratepayer in the street. Write a post in Facebook. If you want to get maximum response, don’t talk about rates, simply mention either the tip or the emptying of the bins. You will trigger an avalanche of complaints and suggestions.

Even if the original item wasn’t about rubbish, responses will rapidly wander from the original topic to any and all aspects of rubbish.

Why does collection cost so much? Why does using the tip cost so much, or more than other tips? Why can’t bins be emptied more often, say weekly? Why can’t we have an annual collection of big waste, such as furniture, like other councils? Why do I have to go all the way to the tip to recycle or dispose of stuff? Why can’t there be recycling stations across the city? Why can’t we have a “general & green waste free entry weekend” in January like Hobart? Why should I pay so much to go to the tip when I already pay so much in rates?

The lesson for council is that while some will obsess over rates, some will obsess over the sale (or not) of the DEC, everyone at least once a fortnight thinks about stuff and how council helps (or not) in disposing of or recycling it.

Absolutely everyone has rubbish, absolutely everyone needs a way to get rid of it. It is personal.

The Jackston Street Tip will fill up and our rubbish will start to end up somewhere outside Glenorchy (maybe Copping). Council and its ratepayers will need to adjust.

Council must work very hard to clearly explain how things will work after the Jackson Street Tip closes, all the various actions they will take to make it happen, and why. Statements like “We all need to be responsible waste managers – individuals, households, business, and Council” are not enough even if absolutely true – rubbish is personal and gets emotional reactions. Pure logic will not suffice.

Deliberate disruption on the roads is good

Leave a reply

We are accustomed to reading in our newspaper for calls to improve our roads whenever there is a particularly horrific accident involving death. The media always appears to scan the local population and locate a person who is quoted as saying that the location of the accident is a black spot that has needed repair or upgrade for years. Motoring organizations are often asked for an opinion and invariably make a statement that implies that the road design or driving surface were in some way substandard or inadequate.

Our roads and highways are becoming smoother and straighter. Our vehicles more often provide cruise control, and are becoming quieter (virtually silent in electric vehicles). The driver’s focus can easily move to what is inside the vehicle: their phone, iPod, or passengers. Reduced attention is almost inevitable.

This obsession with the quality of our roads and highways is misguided.

Better infrastructure encourages the public to take more risks since they perceive those risks to be lower. While risk-taking may in many other contexts help with personal development, it should not be encouraged in situations that may quickly become uncontrollable and life-threatening.

But better infrastructure also has the effect of making it more difficult for the driver to maintain a sufficient focus on what is happening outside the vehicle. This can result in complacency, but most often plain inattention. Not surprisingly, this is the most common cause of accidents on the road, bar none. The driver is distracted, and does not become aware of a potential problem while there is still time to avoid it. If the ultimate objective is to reduce accidents then the focus should be on assisting drivers to maintain their concentration and respect for the road conditions.

I advocate the deliberate introduction of defects and other devices to deliberately disrupt the driving experience. Defects might be very shallow potholes, and variations in the smoothness of the road surface. Disruptive devices might include coloured markers, possibly raised, to give tactile and visual feedback. They could also be speed limit signs placed at random locations, not only where the speed limit changes.

This disruption should be introduced into our driving infrastructure located at random intervals. A further refinement might be to move the defects or devices regularly so that drivers do not become accustomed to their location.

In our state Tasmania, a rough strip has been placed on the verges of many stretches of highway to alert drivers with a loud noise when they are in danger of leaving the road. This action reflects an acknowledgement by the road management authorities that drivers need help. My suggestion simply takes the rough verges to a more comprehensive solution.

Safe driving relies on the driver giving their driving the attention it deserves. The construction of more perfect roadways and vehicles inhibits this. The introduction of random disruption is one way to assist the driver (and the other occupants of the vehicle) to give the the driving process the attention it deserves, and survive their trip unscathed.